Mon–Fri 09:00–17:00 (GMT+8)ENFRARES

GB 29753 and UNECE ATP: which compliance applies to your route

GB 29753-2023 is a Chinese mandatory product standard. The UNECE ATP is a treaty on the international carriage of perishable foodstuffs. They serve different legal purposes, they are not mutually substitutable, and there is no official table for converting one into the other. This page is a selector: it tells you which of them your shipment actually needs, and it states plainly where China stands.

Frameworks compared
2
Scenarios mapped
5
Verified
2026-10-27
ATP classes quoted28
Contracting Parties in Africa2
K values we claim for our bodies0
ATP appendices cited3
01 — Why these two are not interchangeable

Two instruments, two legal purposes

The most common error in supplier websites is treating “complies with GB 29753” as equivalent to “can carry perishable food internationally”. They are different legal acts, issued under different systems, for different journeys.

Table 1 — GB 29753-2023 and the UNECE ATP compared on the points that change a shipment.
DimensionGB 29753-2023UNECE ATP
Legal natureA Chinese mandatory national standard — domestic technical regulationAn intergovernmental treaty under the UNECE framework
What it governsSafety requirements and test methods for refrigerated vehicle productsConformity of special equipment used for the international carriage of perishable foodstuffs
Who issues the certificateA Chinese certification body (for example CCAP, for CCC type approval)A testing station designated or approved by a Contracting Party’s competent authority
Territorial scopeRoad transport inside ChinaTransport operations between at least two Contracting Parties
Consequence of non-complianceThe vehicle cannot be produced, registered or pass annual inspectionDetected at a roadside check, penalised under that country’s national law
Enforcement bodyChinese market-regulation and transport authoritiesNone centrally — each Contracting Party enforces within its own territory

The last row is the one most often misread. The Agreement states that it is “an Agreement between States, and there is no overall enforcing authority. In practice, highway checks are carried out by Contracting Parties.” There is no ATP inspectorate to appeal to.

02 — Route selector

Which compliance applies depends on where the truck runs, not on how cold it gets

Find the row that describes your shipment. Most enquiries we receive fall into row 1 or row 2; rows 3 to 5 apply when the vehicle will be used across borders inside the ATP area.

Table 2 — Scenario-based selector. Rows 1–2 cover domestic use and non-ATP destinations; rows 3–5 cover ATP Contracting Parties.
#Your situationCompliance requiredIssued by
1The truck operates inside ChinaGB 29753-2023 conformity, plus CCC type approvalChinese certification bodies, e.g. CCAP
2Export to a non-ATP country — Kenya, Nigeria, Ghana, TanzaniaDestination-country import conformity, plus Chinese export formalitiesDestination standards body or its appointed agent
3Export to an ATP Contracting Party for international transportATP certificate of compliance, certification plate, distinguishing marksTesting station designated or approved by that Party’s competent authority
4Export to an ATP Contracting Party, used only inside that countryThat country’s national rules, which may take ATP as their basisThat country’s competent authority
5Built in China, exported, finally registered in a Contracting PartyInspection accepted by the registering country’s competent authorityA station approved by a Contracting Party (see 04 below)

Row 2 is where most of our shipments sit. Rows 3 to 5 involve a certificate we cannot issue ourselves — see the next two sections for exactly why.

03 — ATP class thresholds

What the ATP actually measures, and the numbers it sets

ATP Annex 1 classifies equipment into five groups. The figures below are quoted from the Agreement as amended on 22 June 2024. They are the thresholds a testing station applies — they are not measurements of any vehicle we build.

3.1 Insulated equipment

Table 3 — Insulated equipment (ATP Annex 1).
ClassDesignationK coefficient limitAdditional condition
INNormally insulated≤ 0.70 W/m²·°C—
IRHeavily insulated≤ 0.40 W/m²·°CSide walls ≥ 45 mm where width exceeds 2.50 m

3.2 Refrigerated equipment — non-mechanical cold source (ice, eutectic plates, dry ice, liquefied gas)

With an external mean temperature of +30 °C, the empty body must be brought down to and held at:

Table 4 — Refrigerated equipment with a non-mechanical cold source.
ClassInternal temperatureK coefficient limit
A+7 °C (44.6 °F)—
B−10 °C (14 °F)≤ 0.40 W/m²·°C
C−20 °C (−4 °F)≤ 0.40 W/m²·°C
D0 °C (32 °F)—

3.3 Mechanically refrigerated equipment — the group that matters for a refrigerated truck

Table 5 — Mechanically refrigerated equipment, external mean temperature +30 °C.
ClassInternal temperature capability TiK coefficient limit
ASelectable between +12 °C and 0 °C—
BSelectable between +12 °C and −10 °C≤ 0.40 W/m²·°C
CSelectable between +12 °C and −20 °C≤ 0.40 W/m²·°C
DTi ≤ 0 °C—
ETi ≤ −10 °C≤ 0.40 W/m²·°C
FTi ≤ −20 °C≤ 0.40 W/m²·°C

A body that holds −18 °C corresponds to Class F. Class F carries a K coefficient limit of 0.40 W/m²·°C or lower. This is the class most of our export enquiries ultimately need — and the one where a test report, not a brochure, decides the answer.

3.4 Heated equipment, and combined refrigerated/heated equipment

Table 6 — Heated equipment and combined equipment (ATP Annex 1).
GroupClassesRequirement
HeatedA, B, C, DRaise to and hold ≥ +12 °C for at least 12 hours without an external energy supply. Classes B, C and D additionally require K ≤ 0.40; the class letter denotes the external mean temperature the equipment is rated for (−10, −20, −30, −40 °C).
Mechanically refrigerated and heatedA to L (12 classes)Combinations of Ti capability (+12 to 0 °C, or +12 to −20 °C) with an external temperature class of −10, −20, −30 or −40 °C.

Why we publish these numbers and still publish no K value for our own bodies: the numbers above are thresholds written in a treaty. A K value for a specific body is a measured result that only a third-party test report can supply. We do not carry a report for every model, so we do not print a K value next to any model. Ask us about the model you are considering and we will say whether a report exists for it.

04 — China’s position

China is not an ATP Contracting Party, and that changes the paperwork

This is a fact about the treaty, not a limitation of the vehicle. Buyers who do not know it usually discover it at the port.

The mainland of China is not a Contracting Party to the ATP. Under Annex 1, Appendix 1, §1, conformity checks are carried out at a testing station designated or approved by the competent authority of the country in which the equipment is registered. The same provision allows one exception: where the check has already been carried out in the country of manufacture at a station designated or approved for that purpose, it need not be repeated in the country of registration.

Because no ATP competent authority exists in the mainland of China, equipment built there will in practice be inspected by a station approved by a Contracting Party’s competent authority. We state this as an expectation drawn from the text, not as a published ruling, and we recommend confirming the route with your own country’s competent authority before ordering.

Relevant to two African markets
Morocco and Tunisia are Contracting Parties. For those two destinations the ATP can be directly relevant if the vehicle will run cross-border. The full current list of Parties must be read from the UNECE status page; we do not reproduce it here because it changes.
Not relevant to most of our markets
Kenya, Nigeria, Tanzania, Ghana and Ethiopia are not Contracting Parties. Shipments there follow each country’s own import procedure — see the import compliance index.
05 — Checks and certificates

ATP conformity is not issued once and forgotten

Two durations govern a certificated vehicle: how often it is re-checked, and how long the type approval behind it stays valid.

Table 7 — ATP inspection and certification requirements (Annex 1, Appendices 1–3).
ItemRequirementReference
When the check happensBefore the equipment enters into service, then at least once every six years, and whenever the competent authority requires itAnnex 1, App. 1, §1
Type approval for series productionOne unit may be tested for a production series; the test report serves as the type approval certificate and is valid for six yearsAnnex 1, App. 1, §2(a)
What is issuedCertificate of compliance, certification plate, distinguishing marksAnnex 1, App. 3
How insulation and cooling are measuredPrescribed measurement procedures for insulating capacity and cooling capacityAnnex 1, App. 2
06 — Limits of this page

What this page deliberately does not claim

Five refusals, each with its reason. A page that answers everything about two legal systems is usually guessing.

No GB 29753-2023 class table
We could not obtain the text of GB 29753-2023, so we do not reproduce its temperature or K-value classification. Secondary Chinese-language articles on this standard contradict each other five different ways; we treat all of them as unusable rather than pick one.
No conversion between the two systems
No official table converts a GB 29753 class into an ATP class. The two instruments measure different things for different legal purposes, so any conversion would be an invention.
No “we can obtain an ATP certificate for you”
China has no ATP competent authority. An ATP certificate comes from a station approved by a Contracting Party, and we will not imply otherwise to win an order.
No full list of Contracting Parties
The list changes. Any snapshot we print will be wrong eventually, so we point you to the UNECE status page instead.
No destination-country rules
Those are set by each importing country. They live on the import compliance index, and even there we only link to the authority rather than restate its requirements.
07 — Related

The pages this one depends on

08 — Ask

Tell us the route, not just the temperature

If you tell us where the vehicle will be registered and whether it will cross a border, we can say which of the five routes above applies, and what we can and cannot supply as evidence. That answer takes one email and saves a great deal of confusion later.

Send us the destination country and the intended use. We will reply with the compliance route and the documents we hold for that model.

Ask about your route

Sources and verification. ATP figures quoted from the Agreement on the International Carriage of Perishable Foodstuffs, text as amended 22 June 2024, Annex 1 and Annex 1 Appendices 1–3 (UNECE, unece.org, retrieved 2026-10-26). The ATP text in force from 25 August 2026 is listed by the UNECE status page; its Annex 1 has not been compared line by line with the 2024 edition, so the figures above are attributed to the 2024 edition. GB 29753-2023 status and dates per the China national standards database (openstd.samr.gov.cn, retrieved 2026-10-26). Last verified 2026-10-27.

Zhejiang Miaosheng Automobile Co., Ltd. · No.38 Yonghe East Road, Leidian Town, Deqing County, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China · Page last verified 2026-10-27.

Scroll to Top
Get a quote